Brown Medical School
LETTERSSEARCHARCHIVESSUBSCRIBE


ABOUT IDCRADVISORY BOARDRELATED LINKSCONTACT US
JANUARY 2006
Spotlight:

Does incarceration of African-American men facilitate HIV infection of African-American women?


Adaora Adimora, MPH, MD
Associate Professor
Division of Infectious Diseases
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Disclosures: None


Becky White, MD
Assistant Professor
Division of Infectious Diseases
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Director, HIV Services
North Carolina Department of Corrections
Disclosures: None


David A. Wohl, MD
Associate Professor
Division of Infectious Diseases
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Co-Director, HIV Services
North Carolina Department of Corrections
Disclosures: Grant Support: Abbott Laboratories, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Roche Pharmaceuticals, National Institutes of Health; Speakers Bureau: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim.


Introduction

A popular perception, fueled by media portrayals of prisons and jails is that as a result of (consensual or forced) sexual activity during incarceration, male prisoners become exposed to HIV and subsequently infect their partners after release. The recent report of transmission of HIV within the Georgia department of corrections provided evidence for HIV acquisition during incarceration and feeds the characterization of correctional facilities as breeding grounds for HIV.1 However, while it is undeniable that transmission of HIV occurs within correctional facilities, the available data indicate that the majority of HIV-infected inmates enter prison or jail with infection. 2-4

Subsumed by discussions of intramural spread of HIV in prisons and jails is consideration of the potentially greater, albeit indirect, contributions of incarceration to the general HIV epidemic. Emerging data suggest that incarceration, as a socially disruptive force, creates conditions favoring the spread of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), especially in minority communities where incarceration and HIV/STIs are endemic. In this brief Spotlight we describe the potential impact that large-scale incarceration of men, particularly African-American men, may have on the spread of HIV/STIs to African-American women within their communities of origin.

Rates of HIV are disproportionately high among African-American women

African-American women bear a significant burden of the HIV epidemic. From the beginning of the epidemic through 2004, an estimated 84,900 women have died from AIDS - most African-American - and AIDS continues to be a leading cause of death among African-American women.5 According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 14% of adults and adolescents living with AIDS in 1992 were female but as of the end of 2004, this proportion had grown to 23%.5 Two thirds (68%) of the 45,146 women diagnosed with HIV/AIDS during 2001-2004 in the 33 states reporting HIV diagnoses were African-American; 16% were white. The vast majority of HIV-infected women acquire the infection from hetersoexual contact; CDC data indicate that an estimated 70% of women diagnosed with AIDS in 2004 reported sex with a man as the likely mode of HIV transmission (figure 1). 6

The causes of disparities in HIV/STI prevalence and incidence among African-American women are unclear.

Factors that may contribute to racial disparities in HIV and STI rates include those related to health care access and utilization, sexual behaviors and sexual network attributes, distribution of STIs that facilitate HIV transmission and substance use.7 However, a cogent overarching explanation for the markedly increased HIV rates among African-Americans remains elusive.

Available data indicate that differences in sex partner number do not fully explain racial disparities in HIV/STIs.8 Rather, the available evidence suggests that concurrency of sexual partners (the overlapping of sexual relationships in time) and dissortative sexual mixing (sexual partnerships among persons at different levels of risk for HIV/STIs) differs between African-Americans and whites and may provide, at least, a partial explanation for these disparities.9-11 Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) indicate that concurrency of sexual partnerships was more common among African-American women than white women (21% versus 11%), and that the black-white differences in concurrency were largely due to decreased marriage rates among African-Americans and earlier age at first sexual intercourse.11 Other data support a role for dissorative sexual mixing in increasing exposure to HIV/STIs among African-American women. In one recently published case-control study of risk behaviors among African-American men and women, a substantial proportion of HIV-infected African-American women reported few risk factors for HIV acquisition and relatively low numbers of previous sexual partners.8

The potential role of incarceration

Mounting evidence strongly suggests that the convergence of social contextual factors influence individuals behaviors associated with HIV/STI infection and play a critical role in heterosexual HIV transmission among African-American women. Among these factors are aspects of an individual's environment that may influence individual behaviors by destabilizing partnerships, altering the sex ratio and changing social norms to promote partnership concurrency and sexual mixing. 8,12-14

In the U.S., there exists a low ratio of men to women among African-Americans. The severity and persistence of the scarcity of men among African-Americans is unparalleled, eclipsed only by the male shortages experienced in some nations post-WWII.15 A higher death rate among African-American males, due to infant mortality, disease, and violence, accounts for some of this imbalance.16 Incarceration, which is epidemic in many African-American communities futher exacerbates this low sex ratio. African-Americans comprise 12% of the U.S. population, but represent over 40% of federal and state prison inmate population.17 The U.S. Department of Justice predicts that one in three African-American men will be imprisoned during their lifetime (versus < 5% of white men).18 The disproportionate arrest and incarceration of African-American has resulted in a pervasiveness of incarceration that has led to imprisonment becoming a 'normal' part of life for many young African-American men, replacing other traditional life events (e.g., marriage).19

In addition to contributing to the scarcity of men, incarceration may foster HIV/STI transmission in several other ways. First, incarceration directly affects sexual networks by disrupting existing partnerships. The incarcerated partner may form risky partnerships with other inmates - a group with a high prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV infection.1,4,20-22 Second, the partner remaining in the community forfeits the social and sexual companionship of the incarcerated partner and may pursue other partnerships to meet these needs.8 Loss of a partner to incarceration can also lead to economic losses and less personal safety/security - additional potential motivations for a forming new intimate partnership(s). Incarceration of a partner has been associated with greater prevalence of sexual concurrency among young adults in Seattle.23 While incarceration may be a marker for sexual risk behaviors, it can also promote sexual partner concurrency by temporarily removing a partner from the relationship. With the absence of her partner, a woman may enter into a new relationship and in a community where HIV is relatively prevalent, her exposure to HIV infection is, therefore, increased. A qualitative study of concurrent partnerships among adults described "separational" concurrency among persons with partners who were frequently incarcerated.24 Third, incarceration adversely impacts the social fabric of the communities of origin of the incarcerated. A prison record usually makes men less employable,25 contributing to high community unemployment rates. Therefore, incarceration can shrink not only the absolute number of men but also the proportion of men who are financially attractive as partners. Unemployment also increases the likelihood of poverty and resultant instability of long-term partnerships.26,27 Lastly, mass imprisonment distorts social norms. The 'downstream' effects of incarceration may be detected in the emergence of a prison/jail culture in communities where incarceration becomes normative 28 - potentially further influencing sexual behavior and sexual networks.8

Studies in the sociology and criminal justice literature provide ample evidence of a deleterious effect of incarceration on families and communities, including African-American communities.29-36 Although the male partner may be criminally involved prior to incarceration, these men often contribute some of their gains to their partner and this loss of income can be devastating for women straining to live at or near poverty levels.29 The financial burden of incarceration for those left behind is further compounded by the loss of assistance with childcare and the expenses related to maintaining contact with the incarcerated man.29-33 Importantly, the loss of a male partner has been found to increase the risk of partnership dissolution.34 In one study, spousal absence due to incarceration or military service was associated with a two-fold risk of marital dissolution.35 Qualitative studies find that incarceration of a man leads to loneliness among female partners.33-36

Lastly, several investigations have described HIV/STI transmission risk behavior among prison releasees, including HIV-infected former inmates.37-38 Coupled with data demonstrating a loss of the viral suppression achieved during in-prison HIV care following release 39,40 a picture of increased infectiousness and renewed risk behavior on community re-entry emerges and reinforces calls to improve pre- and post-release HIV prevention strategies.

Summary

The high rates of HIV and other STIs among African-American women remains unexplained and likely is results from the confluence of behavior, social and economic factors. The available evidence suggests that the disruptive effects of incarceration on relationships and communities already burdened with HIV and other STIs may facilitate the spread of these infections and place African-American women at increased risk for infection. Further study of the effects of incarceration on the partners and the communities inmates leave behind are required to better understand the unintended public health consequences of incarceration and to develop appropriate strategies to reduce the impact of incarceration on HIV/STI transmission.

References
1 CDC. HIV Transmission Among Male Inmates in a State Prison System --- Georgia, 1992--2005. MMWR;55(15):421-26.
2 Macalino GE, Vlahov D, Sanford-Colby S, et al. Prevalence and incidence of HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus infections among males in Rhode Island prisons [published correction appears in Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1847]. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1218-1223.
3 Rich JD, Dickinson BP, Macalino G, et al. Prevalence and incidence of HIV among incarcerated and reincarcerated women in Rhode Island. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999;22:161-166.
4 Spaulding A, Stephenson B, Macalino G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus in correctional facilities: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:305-312.
5 CDC. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2004. Vol. 16. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC: 2005:1-46.
6 CDC. Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses-33 states, 2001-2004. MMWR 2005;54:1149-1153.
7 Aral SO, Holmes K. Epidemiology of sexual behavior and sexually transmitted diseases. In: Holmes K, Mardh P-A, Sparling P, Wiesner P, eds. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1990.
8 Adimora African-American, Schoenbach VJ. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis 2005; 191(Suppl 1):S11522
9 Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis 1999; 26:25061.
10 Adimora A, Schoenbach V, Bonas D, Martinson F, Donaldson K, Stancil T. Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology 2002; 13:32027.
11 Doherty IA, Adimora African-American, Schoenbach VJ. Sexual mixing patterns and heterosexually-acquired HIV infection among African Americans in North Carolina. In: International Society for STD Research. Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 2005.
12 Adimora African-American, Schoenbach VJ, Martinson FE, Donaldson KH, Fullilove RE, Aral SO. Social context of sexual relationships among rural African Americans. Sex Transm Dis 2001; 28:6976.
13 Thomas JC, Torrone E. Incarceration as forced migration: effects on selected community health outcomes. Am J Public Health. 2006 Oct;96(10):1762-5.
14 Farley TA. Sexually transmitted diseases in the Southeastern United States: location, race, and social context. Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jul;33(7 Suppl):S58-64
15 Guttentag M, Secord P. Too many women: the sex ratio question. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983.
16 Geronimus A, Bound J, Waidmann T, Hillemeier M, Burns P. Excess mortality among blacks and whites in the United States. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:15528.
17 Bonczar TP. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report: Prevalence of Imprisonment in the US Population, 1974-2001. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice; August 2003. Document NCJ 197976. Available at: www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/llgsfp.htm.
18 Harrison PM, Beck AJ. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin: Prisoners in 2004. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; October 2005. Document NCJ 210677. Available at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ bjs/abstract/p04.htm.
19 Pettit B and Western B. Mass imprisonment and the life course: Race and class inequality in US incarceration. American Sociological Review. 2004;69(2):151-169.
20 Cohen D, Scribner R, Clark J, Cory D. The potential role of custody facilities in con trolling sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Public Health 1992; 82:5526. 80.
21 Wolfe MI, Xu F, Patel P, et al. An outbreak of syphilis in Alabama prisons: correctional health policy and communicable disease control. Am J Public Health 2001; 91:1220581.
22 Spaulding A, Lubelczyk RB, Flanigan T. Can unsafe sex behind bars be barred? Am J Public Health 2001; 91:11767
23 Manhart, L.E., et al., Sex partner concurrency: measurement, prevalence, and correlates among urban 18-39-year-olds. Sex Transm Dis, 2002. 29(3): p. 133-43.
24 Gorbach, P.M., et al., "It takes a village": understanding concurrent sexual partnerships in Seattle, Washington. Sex Transm Dis, 2002. 29(8): p. 453-62.
25 Butterfield, F., Freed from prison, but still paying a penalty: Ex-convicts face many sanctions, in The New York Times. 2002: New York. p. A.18.
26 Ross, H. and I. Sawhill, Time of Transition: The Growth of Families Headed by Women. 1975, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
27 Hoffman, S. and J. Holmes, Husbands, Wives, and Divorce, in Five Thousand American Families - Patterns of Economic Progress, G. Duncan and J. Morgan, Editors. 1976, Institute for Social Research: Ann Arbor, Michigan. p. 23-75.
28 Patterson O. A poverty of the mind (Op-Ed), New York Times, March 26, 2006.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/26/opinion/26patterson.html?ex=1301029200&en=23bf0dce1434780d&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
29 Miller, R.R., Browning, S.L. and Murphy, L. (2001). Introduction and Brief Review of the Impact of Incarceration on the African American Family. Journal of African American Men. 6 (1).
30 Clayton O and Moore J. The effects of crime and imprisonment on family formation. In Black Fathers in Contemporary American Society: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Strategies for Change. Ed Obie Clayton, Ronald B. Mincy, and David Blankenhorn. Institue of American Values.
31 Visher C, et al. Returning Home: Understanding the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry Maryland Pilot Study: Findings from Baltimore. Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center, 2004. www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=410974
32 Wright LE and Symour CB. Effects on the Family. In Working with Children and Families Separated by Incarceration: A handbook for child welfare agencies. CWLA Press, Washington, D.C. 2000
33 Fishman S. Losing a loved one to incarceration: The effect of imprisonment on family members. Personal and Guidance Journal. 1981;32:372-376.
34 Fishman LT. Living Alone. In Women at the Wall: A study of prisoner's wives doing time on the outside. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY. 1990
35 Rindfuss, RR. and Stephen EH. Marital Noncohabitation: Separation Does Not Make the Heart Grow Fonder. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1990. 52: 259-70.
36 Comfort M, Grinstead O, McCartney K, et al. You can't do nothing in this damn place: Sex and intimacy among couples with an incarcerated male partner. The Journal of Sex Research. 2005. 42;1:3-12
37 Stephenson BL, Wohl DA, McKaig R, et al. Sexual behaviours of HIV-seropositive men and women following release from prison. Int J STD AIDS. 2006;17:103-108
38 Grinstead OA, Faigeles B, Comfort M, et al. HIV, STD, and hepatitis risk to primary female partners of men being released from prison. Women Health. 2005;41(2):63-80.
39 Stephenson BL, Wohl DA, Golin CE, et al. Effect of release from prison and re-incarceration on the viral loads of HIV-infected individuals. Public Health Rep. 2005;120:84-88.
40 Springer SA, Pesanti E, Hodges J, et al. Effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected prisoners: reincarceration and the lack of sustained benefit after release to the community. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1754-1760.

Back to Top

 

INSIDE THIS ISSUE
Main Article I : Managing the Side Effects of Hepatitis C Treatment in a Correctional Environment
Editor's Letter Authors: David Alain Wohl, MD
Case Study: Hepatitis C Therapy
Download PDF: Download a copy of the entire newsletter in PDF format.

IDCR is grateful for the support of the following companies through educational grants:

Infectious Diseases in
Corrections Report
Elizabeth Closson
Managing Editor
Infectious Disease in
Corrections Report
idcrme@gmail.com
www.idcronline.org
146 Clifford St.
Providence, RI 02903
ph. (401)453-2068
fax. (401)272-7562